Thursday, February 09, 2006

More on Mohammed

One of the opinion writers on stuff (A New Zealand newspaper site) has made some excellent points about the whole cartoon mess http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/0,2106,3565956a1861,00.html

The latest news is that the islamic world wants the new UN human rights body to legislate against blasphemy http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/0,2106,3567029a12,00.html, What next?, will they make it compulsory for all westerners to pray 5 times a day to allah, just in case a muslim is offended by their lack of piety?

I for one am offended by the islamic response to these cartoons and by the concilitory approach of many western governments, but i'm not likely to walk into a crowded shopping mall and blow myself up, I'm not going to kidnap and execute tourists and aid workers, so nobody cares what i think.

The editors of the danish newspaper in question has said he wouldn't publish holocaust cartoons, i think perhaps i'm further down the free speech road than most as i believe that it is acceptable to publish cartoons about this, although i can't think of any possible cartoon with legitimate relevance (as the muslim cartoons have) regarding the holocaust. I'm happy for an islamic newspaper to publish whatever cartoons it wants about my religion (catholic), about my country (New Zealand) or anything else it should choose.

Wednesday, February 08, 2006

Mohammad Cartoons

Since the holy crusades of the 12th century, a certain level of antagonism has existed between the Islamic world and the judeo-Christian world, an antagonism that is still alive and well as the latest conflict over certain Danish cartoons has revealed.

What is so offensive about the satirical depiction of a religious figure that embassies are attacked by firebombs and journalists fear for their lives?, Iranian leaders have claimed that the mere depiction of Mohammad is cause enough, but images of Mohammad have been plentiful throughout history, many originating from the middle east.
http://reiffonlife.blogspot.com/2006/02/mohammed-image-archive-depictions-of.html

Was this conflict engineered by Islamic extremists? Some reports have stated that the catalyst for the Islamic worlds anger was not simply the 12 cartoons published by J...., but rather a series of 43 images that were some months ago taken on a 'road-show' of Iran, some, notably more offensive than those published by the newspaper, purportedly generated by the extremists themselves as an exercise in generating anger among Muslims
http://counterterror.typepad.com/the_counterterrorism_blog/2006/02/fabricated_cart.html

I believe that the western world cannot afford to bow and scrape to the demands of Tehran to follow their religious laws, We cannot afford our enlightenment to be smothered by the middle eastern equivalent of the Spanish inquisition. I congratulate those news organizations that have decided to republish the cartoons throughout the western world.

I strongly believe that all speech should be free, I believe that this includes religious or racial denigration, holocaust denial and support for ideals which go against the grain of society because we cannot have a truly enlightened future if our ideals are shaped by deliberate exclusion of controversial material. I believe that governments have a right, no, a duty to express disapproval of what they deem 'dangerous' or unduly offensive, but I do not believe they have the moral right to decide what individuals may share among themselves.